KRE folyóiratok

Permanent URI for this community

https://krepozit.kre.hu/handle/123456789/11802
A kategória tartalmazza a Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, vagy valamely szervezeti egységének gondozásában megjelent folyóiratok lapszámait, és azok teljes szövegét.

Browse

Browsing KRE folyóiratok by Author "Corvinus Egyetem"

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Book Review: AI and the Human Rights of Minorities
    (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, 2025) Saleem, Rutaba; Corvinus Egyetem
    This book review analyses Artificial Intelligence and Human Rights (Oxford University Press, 2023), an edited volume by Alberto Quintavalla and Jeroen Temperman, which provides a comprehensive examination of how artificial intelligence (AI) technologies intersect with international human rights law. Focusing on nine key chapters, the review emphasises the book’s relevance for minority protection. It examines how biased data, and opaque algorithms reproduce structural discrimination in policing, employment, and digital speech regulation; how facial recognition and predictive analytics threaten liberty, assembly, and privacy; and how “digital authoritarianism” is proportionately targets ethnic and religious minorities in the Global South. The contributors’ interdisciplinary approach, bridging law, ethics, and computer science, underscores that algorithmic harms are embedded throughout the AI life cycle and must be anticipated through rights based risk assessments rather than mitigated ex post facto. The book’s novelty lies in integrating minority protection into broader debates on AI governance and in advocating for participatory mechanisms that include affected communities in the design of regulations.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Dual roles and rights implications. The unsettled dynamics of AI use in relation to minoritised communities
    (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, 2025) Dabis Attila; Corvinus Egyetem
    This paper explores the volatile relationship between artificial intelligence (AI) tools and minoritised communities, addressing the primary research question: In what ways does the deployment of AI technologies in both democratic and authoritarian contexts affect minoritised groups, particularly regarding bias, discrimination, human rights violations, and the preservation or erosion of cultural and linguistic identities? The study utilises a mixed-methods approach, integrating content analysis of international human rights instruments and relevant scholarly literature with case studies, such as the implementation of AI-driven surveillance on the Uyghur community in China or various instances of language revitalisation supported by AI tools. The research underscores the dual nature of AI applications. On the one hand, AI tools can be employed for oppressive measures, including ethnic profiling, extensive surveillance, and cultural oppression, as demonstrated in the Uyghur case. Conversely, AI offers promising avenues for preserving the identity of minoritised communities, par ticularly through language revitalisation and cultural preservation, fostering inclusivity and empowering marginalised populations within digital environments. This study aims to contribute to the underexplored intersection of AI and minoritised communities by presenting an interdiscipli nary perspective that connects AI development with the protection of minority rights. The findings emphasise the necessity of a humanrights-based framework in AI design and implementation, highlighting the potential for AI to enhance the empowerment of minoritised communities while also recognising the dangers of exploitation in authoritarian regimes.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Kísérletek a magyarországi nemzetiségi kérdés rendezésére, 1848-1918
    (Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, 2025) Jeszenszky Géza; Corvinus Egyetem
    This study investigates whether earlier and more substantive political compromise between Hungary and its non-Hungarian nationalities could have prevented the disintegration of the historic kingdom by 1918. It asks how successive attempts at accommodation, from 1848 to the 1868 Nationalities Law, addressed the demands of emerging national movements and why they ultimately failed. Methodologically, the analysis relies on a close reading of primary legal and parliamentary documents (1848, 1861, 1868), contemporary political writings (Eötvös, Kemény, Kossuth, Teleki), and later historiography, particularly the syntheses of Katus László and Szarka László, which draw on archival sources and parliamentary records. These materials facilitate a comparative assessment of constitutional proposals, nationality programs, and the political constraints that shape them. The findings show that meaningful compromise was repeatedly conceivable, most clearly in 1861, yet systematically derailed by conflicting territorial claims, the mixed ethnic geography of the Carpathian Basin, and the Hungarian political elite’s insistence on a unitary political nation. Although the 1868 law represented a liberal milestone in individual rights, it lacked mechanisms for enforcing collective protections and was inconsistently implemented, accelerating political estrangement. The study’s value lies in reframing Hungary’s nationality policy as a series of missed historic openings rather than a linear path to the Treaty of Trianon. Understanding these aborted settlements sheds light on why constructive minority accommodation failed in a region where linguistic, territorial, and political claims overlapped, providing insights that remain relevant for contemporary Central European minority governance.