Essentials of an LFG analysis of Hungarian finite sentences
dc.contributor.author | Laczkó Tibor | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-09T12:29:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09T12:29:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper I present an LFG (and XLE-implementable) analysis of the preverbal portion of Hungarian finite clauses. The structural representation is largely motivated by É. Kiss (1992) and Laczkó & Rákosi (2008-2014). I argue for S and against IP (and I also postulate CP). I employ a hierarchical, binary branching, adjunction structure for the topic field, in addition to a similar setup in the quantifier field. I handle all the question phrases other than the question phrase immediately adjacent to the verb in multiple constituent questions as occupying VP-adjoined positions in the quantifier field. I assume that focussed constituents, verbal modifiers and the (verb-adjacent) question phrase are in complementary distribution in [Spec,VP]. On the basis of the analysis proposed in this paper, I suggest that LFG’s parametric space that is potentially available to c-structure—function associations should be augmented along the following lines. (i) The [Spec,VP] position should be allowed to host the FOCUS discourse function. (ii) The XP in [S XP VP] can also be a topic, in addition to a subject. (iii) A VP constituent can also contain a subject. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1098-6782 | |
dc.identifier.mtmt | 2851923 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://krepozit.kre.hu/handle/123456789/392 | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.relation.ispartof | PROCEEDINGS OF THE LFG CONFERENCE 14 pp. 325-345. , 21 p. (2014) | |
dc.title | Essentials of an LFG analysis of Hungarian finite sentences | |
dc.type | Article |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- 2851923_Laczkó Tibor Sándor.pdf
- Size:
- 389.73 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Description: