From Mistaking Fakeness to Mistake in Fakeness. Artificial Ruins Between Aesthetics and Deception

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorSomhegyi Zoltán
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-23T07:48:56Z
dc.date.available2023-11-23T07:48:56Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractAesthetic attraction and artful execution of the object, careful design and seemingly blatant falsification by the creator, voluntarily accepted counterfeit imitation and celebration of a melancholy-filled illusion – these, and many other, often contradictory, particularities can describe one of the most complex aesthetic phenomena, that of fake ruins. Questions of perfection and mistake, accurate planning and permissive randomness, genuineness and authenticity – or the convincing justification of aesthetic experience despite the complete lack of them – profound references to the nature of decay, the transience of all human creation and nostalgia can all be found around this object of art. In this article I analyse the fakeness of fake ruins with regard to the multiple consequences that this type of fake can contribute to the better understanding of both their aesthetics and the concept of mistake.
dc.identifier.doi10.7413/18258646149
dc.identifier.issn0585-4733
dc.identifier.issn1825-8646
dc.identifier.mtmt32050939
dc.identifier.urihttps://krepozit.kre.hu/handle/123456789/507
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofSTUDI DI ESTETICA 2021 : 19 pp. 59-74. , 16 p. (2021)
dc.titleFrom Mistaking Fakeness to Mistake in Fakeness. Artificial Ruins Between Aesthetics and Deception
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
32050939_Zoltán György Somheg.pdf
Size:
169.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Művészettörténet Tanszék