Művészettudományi és Szabadbölcsészeti Intézet

Permanent URI for this community

https://krepozit.kre.hu/handle/123456789/330

Browse

Browsing Művészettudományi és Szabadbölcsészeti Intézet by Author "Pásztori-Kupán István"

Now showing 1 - 5 of 5
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    A görög betegségek orvoslása I.: Fordította, magyarázó jegyzetekkel és bevezetővel ellátta Pásztori-Kupán István
    (Debreceni Református Hittudományi Egyetem Hatvani István Teológiai Kutatóközpontja, 2014) Pásztori-Kupán István; Küroszi Theodórétosz
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Cyril and Theodoret on the Temptation of Christ: An Imaginary Dialogue Between Alexandrian and Antiochene Christological Positions
    (2022) Pásztori-Kupán István
    In this paper some parallelisms and differences are presented between two ancient theological traditions concerning their model of Christ by comparing two representative figures of both schools, namely Theodoret of Cyrus and Cyril of Alexandria. Since the Christology of the two authors could not be compared in detail within such a paper, the investigation resumes itself to the mode how they interpret the Lord’s Temptation by the devil in the wilderness. The works involved in the analysis include Theodoret’s treatise On the incarnation written in 431 before the Council of Ephesus, the fragments of Cyril’s Commentary on Matthew as well as his Commentary on Luke. The doctrinal conclusion of this comparison is that the two traditions represented by these illustrious theologians—despite their conspicuous and undeniable differences— signify rather complementary than flatly opposing views and that the two ancient traditions have found their revival even in the sixteenth century, and continue to influence the theologians of our time. This is why the author considers Chalcedon as being a corridor (in which both traditions can walk side by side whilst respecting the limits set by ‘the columns’, i.e. the four famous expressions) rather than a narrow path or a tightrope-walking, where only one is able to go through.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    The Number and Authority of the Ecumenical Councils in the Second Helvetic Confession
    (2023) Pásztori-Kupán István
    Whilst Bullinger’s CHP accepts the decisions of the first four ecumenical councils, no description has been produced concerning their criteria. Based on the common features of Nicaea, Constantinople, Ephesus and Chalcedon, the Apostles’ Council of Jerusalem would fit the pattern, with one exception: it had neither been convened nor supervised by secular rulers. Why did the strongly Bible-oriented Reformers fail to ‘renumber’ the ecumenical councils starting with the one in Jerusalem, as they did e.g. with the Decalogue or the sacraments? Apparently, they acquiesced in the already established state of affairs to appease the contemporary secular powers, whilst preserving Chalcedon’s Christological and soteriological heritage.
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Open Access
    Theodoret of Cyrus
    (Routledge, 2006) Pásztori-Kupán István