The Undertaking as an Alternative to Secondary Insolvency Proceeding in Romania and in Hungary - A comparative analysis

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMuzsalyi Róbert
dc.contributor.authorCsőke Andrea
dc.contributor.authorNastasie, Nicoleta Mirela
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-19T19:50:22Z
dc.date.available2024-03-19T19:50:22Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.description.abstractThe differences between Member States with regard to substantive and procedural rules a common source of difficulties in cross-border dimension. The same is true for insolvency proceedings. Among others, Regulation 2015/848 of the European Parliament and the Council on insolvency proceedings (hereinafter: EIR-R) provides some new legal instruments to limit the possibility of secondary insolvency proceedings. Undertaking (Art. 36.) is one of the new features, and was not known before in Continental legal systems. We consider that the application of an undertaking in different insolvency regimes also causes some difficulties. To demonstrate this assumption, we will compare the Romanian and the Hungarian legislation in this field and show the differences and similarities.
dc.identifier.mtmt32182271
dc.identifier.urihttps://krepozit.kre.hu/handle/123456789/989
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherKároli Gáspár Református Egyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar
dc.relation.ispartofseriesKAROLI MUNDUS; 1.
dc.titleThe Undertaking as an Alternative to Secondary Insolvency Proceeding in Romania and in Hungary - A comparative analysis
dc.typeArticle
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
32182271_Róbert Muzsalyi.pdf
Size:
188.86 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
Collections
Polgári Eljárásjogi Tanszék