Polgári Eljárásjogi Tanszék
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
- ItemOpen AccessTaking of Evidence in the New Hungarian Code of Civil Procedure(2017) Király Lilla
- ItemOpen AccessAz új magyar polgári perrendtartás megszületése és legújabb szabályai(2017) Király Lilla
- ItemOpen AccessA külföldi választottbírósági ítéletek elismerésének és végrehajtásának megtagadása a New York-i Egyezmény alkalmazása során(Nemzeti Közszolgálati Egyetem, 2022) Muzsalyi Róbert
- ItemOpen AccessDo Member States have procedural autonomy?:(Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem, Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar, 2022) Muzsalyi Róbert
- ItemOpen AccessThe Undertaking as an Alternative to Secondary Insolvency Proceeding in Romania and in Hungary - A comparative analysis(Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem Állam- és Jogtudományi Kar, 2021) Muzsalyi Róbert; Csőke Andrea; Nastasie, Nicoleta MirelaThe differences between Member States with regard to substantive and procedural rules a common source of difficulties in cross-border dimension. The same is true for insolvency proceedings. Among others, Regulation 2015/848 of the European Parliament and the Council on insolvency proceedings (hereinafter: EIR-R) provides some new legal instruments to limit the possibility of secondary insolvency proceedings. Undertaking (Art. 36.) is one of the new features, and was not known before in Continental legal systems. We consider that the application of an undertaking in different insolvency regimes also causes some difficulties. To demonstrate this assumption, we will compare the Romanian and the Hungarian legislation in this field and show the differences and similarities.