Bölcsészet- és Társadalomtudományi Kar (Tudományos publikációk BTK) - Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
- ItemOpen AccessHagyomány és/vagy korszerűség: az erkölcsi nevelés kérdései a reformkorban(Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem Hittudományi Kar Egyháztörténeti Kutatóintézet, 2026) Czeglédi Sándor; Történettudományi Intézet; Ókortörténeti és Segédtudományi Tanszék; KRE - Bölcsészet- és Társadalomtudományi KarThis study examines questions about moral education that emerged during the Hungarian Reform Era, as reflected in three pedagogical manuals and two influential periodicals. The authors – Pál Edvi Illés, János Warga and Fidél Beély – agree that education should have a religious and moral foundation, and that love plays a significant role. While the Protestant authors advocated influencing emotions, the Catholic Beély urged a balance between intellect and emotion. In terms of educators’ personalities, all three considered love and empathy to be the most effective methods, while viewing praise as counterproductive. In addition to German philosophy, the Protestant authors were influenced by physico-theology. Differences emerged regarding corporal punishment: the Catholic journal Religio és Nevelés (Religion and Education) defended it, whereas the Protestant Church and School Gazette resolutely opposed it. The study highlights that the pedagogy of the era was a synthesis of Enlightenment ideas and Biblical and ancient traditions. It also emphasises that the principles of moral education can only be authentically interpreted within their own context.
- ItemOpen AccessA 18. századi ellenreformáció Eszterházy József posthuma memoriája alapján(2026) Gyócsi Ádám; Történelemtudományi Doktori Iskola; Károli Gáspár Református EgyetemThrough his trusted men, Eszterházy continued the court’s Counter-Reformation policy throughout his dominions, albeit on a small scale. He supported his own Catholic Church, sometimes at the expense of Protestant churches, and he also enlisted the help of settled Slavic and German settlers to do this. His brother Ferenc assisted him in this endeavour and continued his legacy after his death. However, his son was less enthusiastic, so he entrusted his secretary to fulfil his legacy according to his wishes. Although the Memoria only describes the struggles of Protestants living on the Eszterházy estates due to the landlord’s religious policy, a tangible, albeit incomplete, positive change in the lives of Protestant denominations occurred in the „long 18th century” with the 1781 Edict of Tolerance, which was completed in 1848.
- ItemOpen AccessMozaikok a Táci Református Egyházközség történetéből a kezdetektől az 1730-as évekig(Károli Gáspár Református Egyetem Hittudományi Kar Egyháztörténeti Kutatóintézet, 2026) Borsos Mátyás; Történelemtudományi Doktori Iskola; Károli Gáspár Református EgyetemThe village of Tác in Fejér County was founded in the 1670s following the destruction of the medieval Föveny settlement. There are no surviving records detailing the early organisation of the church, and identifying the first three ministers has proven difficult. This changed in 1689 when András Patai arrived in the village and started to keep the parish register. His records provide insight into the life of a community that had just been freed from Ottoman rule. A school was built in 1691, and a new church was erected on the site of the old one in 1696. This church still stands today. Unfortunately, during the War of Independence under Rákóczi, the parish register fell into foreign hands and was not recovered until the late 1730s. Alongside the register entries, this study also includes two letters written in the 1720s by János Jámbor, the parish priest of Ozora. In these letters, he complains about Bálint Balassa, the notary of Tác. These texts may offer useful information for researching the history of the church during this period, particularly for studies focusing on individuals’ lives and careers (prosopography).
- ItemOpen AccessFűtől fáig, váltságtól vadságig. Kazinczy Ferenc Zrínyi-olvasata(Móricz Zsigmond Kulturális Egyesület, 2026) Bene Sándor; Magyar Nyelv-, Irodalom- és Kultúratudományi Intézet; Régi és Klasszikus Magyar Irodalom Tanszék; KRE - Bölcsészet- és Társadalomtudományi Kar
- ItemOpen AccessKitelepítéstől a migrációig. Az Irodalomtudományi Intézet kézikönyvei és az irodalomtörténeti kánon(2025) Bene Sándor; Magyar Nyelv-, Irodalom- és Kultúratudományi Intézet; Régi és Klasszikus Magyar Irodalom Tanszék; KRE - Bölcsészet- és Társadalomtudományi KarThe study reviews the series of handbooks on Hungarian literary history written and edited in the Institute of Literary Studies (former Institute of Literary History). It concludes that the prerequisite for the success of collective works of this nature is the creation of a solid institutional background. In this case, the six-volume series entitled A magyar irodalom története (The History of Hungarian Literature), published between 1964 and 1966, was produced by full-time researchers at the Institute, which was founded in 1955 within the organizational framework of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences for this very purpose. The consolidation phase of Marxist ideology after 1956 enabled a number of methodological innovations. No author was excluded or “displaced” any more from national literary history because of ideological reasons. The creation of the comprehensive handbook was supported by well-organized and well-funded primary research-in-the-field for sources and comparative history of literary criticism as well. In recent decades, circumstances have not allowed for the successful repetition of this project, despite the absence of ideological control. Since the end of the 2010s, the Institute of Literary Studies has been separated from the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and its institutional framework has changed twice since then; instead of migration of texts, authors and ideas, literary historians are invited to deal with their own migration between various institutions. The constant uncertainty about funding and the frequent changes in the institutional background are a real obstacle to a long-term collective literary history work.